Yael Kimhi , Yifat Mirsky , Nirit Bauminger-Zviely
Abstract
Many children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have challenges in reading comprehension, especially when implicit information in narrative texts is involved. Three interrelated factors influencing reading comprehension have been proposed to explain these challenges: Theory of Mind – ToM; executive functions – EF; and central coherence – CC. This study investigated the differential contribution of these cognitive abilities to reading comprehension among cognitively able children with ASD compared to matched peers with typical development (TD). 28 third-grade children with ASD and 28 third-grade children with TD participated in the study. Four measures were administered: ToM, CC, EF (working memory, planning, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility), and reading comprehension. One-way ANOVAs were computed to examine group differences in cognitive characteristics (ToM, CC, EF) and reading comprehension. Regressions were performed to examine the contribution of cognitive characteristics (ToM, CC, EF) to reading comprehension abilities (explicit, implicit, and general score) in ASD and TD. The TD group outperformed the ASD group in ToM and various EF measures but not in CC or reading comprehension. Positive main effects were found for ToM, and EF measures (planning – 3rd level, inhibition, and cognitive flexibility), demonstrating their contribution to reading comprehension abilities in both groups. Interactions revealed positive main effects for EF planning and CC for the ASD group only, showing the contribution of EF planning and CC for better reading comprehension. Our findings suggest different processing mechanisms regarding reading comprehension in each group.
摘要
许多患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的儿童在阅读理解方面存在挑战,尤其是当涉及叙事文本中的隐含信息时。影响阅读理解的三个相关因素被提出来解释这些挑战:心理理论;执行职能-EF;和中央相干- CC。这项研究调查了有认知能力的自闭症儿童与有典型发展(TD)的同龄人相比,这些认知能力对阅读理解的不同贡献。28名患有自闭症的三年级儿童和28名患有TD的三年级儿童参加了这项研究。实施了四项测量:ToM、CC、EF(工作记忆、计划、抑制控制、认知灵活性)和阅读理解。计算单向ANOVAs以检查认知特征(ToM、CC、EF)和阅读理解的组间差异。进行回归分析以检验认知特征(ToM、CC、EF)对阅读理解能力(显性、隐性和总分)的影响。TD组在心理理论和各种EF指标方面优于ASD组,但在交际能力或阅读理解方面则不然。发现ToM和EF测量(第三级规划、抑制和认知灵活性)具有积极的主要影响,表明它们对两组的阅读理解能力都有贡献。互动揭示了仅ASD组的EF计划和CC的积极主要影响,显示了EF计划和CC对更好的阅读理解的贡献。我们的研究结果表明,每组学生阅读理解的加工机制不同。